“What did you put in my drink?”—the chilling question a dying pregnant woman asked as a murder trial grips Tennessee.
Story Highlights
- Witness says victim accused boyfriend of spiking her drink during a final phone call [1][2]
- Medical examiner found lethal cocaine levels and ruled acute cocaine toxicity [1][2]
- Indictment charges four counts of first-degree murder, including the unborn child [3]
- Defense denies motive and points to victim’s prior substance use; no direct physical link [1][2]
Sworn Testimony Describes Final Call and Accusations
Witness Niga Jackson testified that Jade Benning called at 9:29 p.m. on February 25, 2023. Jackson said Benning asked, “What did you put in my drink? I knew my drink tasted funny,” and accused boyfriend Blaise Taylor of trying to stop the baby. The jury heard that the call lasted six minutes and nine seconds. Prosecutors say this call shows Benning’s state and intent to identify harm in real time, not hours later after confusion set in [1][2].
Emergency workers later found Benning face down on her bed, with pink frothy vomit on her mouth and bedding. Responders reported no pulse at the scene. Prosecutors argue the scene fits acute poisoning. The next steps in court will focus on what happened between the call and the arrival of help, and whether Taylor’s actions helped or hid the danger that night [1][2].
Toxicology Findings and The State’s Theory of Intent
Medical examiner Dr. Aaron Carney told jurors that tests showed extraordinarily high cocaine levels in Benning’s blood and in her vomit. He called the cause “acute cocaine toxicity” and described levels beyond those he had seen in other deaths. Prosecutors say the science points to a rapid, concentrated dose. They add that Taylor dialed 911 but described an allergy reaction and did not share that Benning was pregnant, missing facts that could guide urgent care [1][2].
The indictment filed March 13, 2024, sets out four first-degree murder counts. The state alleges Taylor unlawfully and intentionally killed Benning and her unborn child with premeditation, as defined by Tennessee law. The charges show how the state views both victims under statute. The case now turns on whether jurors believe the state has tied those toxic results to Taylor’s intent beyond a reasonable doubt [3].
Defense Counters With Lifestyle Claims and Gaps in Evidence
The defense says Taylor did not drink or use drugs and had no reason to force an abortion. They describe the relationship as casual and non-exclusive. They point to Benning’s past use of marijuana and medicines like Adderall to argue her drug history could explain the crisis. They stress there is no direct physical proof, such as cocaine in Taylor’s possession or video of him spiking a drink, linking him to the act itself [1][2].
Defense lawyers also pressed errors around text messages. A message that read, “My body is starting to feel like it’s shutting down,” was first tied to Benning. A witness later said it came from someone named Najaya. The court instructed the jury that the message was not Benning’s and not evidence. That dispute weakens digital proof and reminds jurors to separate clean facts from noise [1][2].
Pattern Concerns, Prior Allegations, and What Comes Next
Prosecutors raised an earlier incident from 2017 through a witness named Apple Denny. She testified Taylor tried to get her to take abortion pills without her knowledge. The state offers this to show motive and pattern. The defense has not yet provided a detailed forensic rebuttal to the toxicology findings or to the 911 omissions. Jurors will weigh whether that prior story points to intent or is too remote to matter here [1][2].
⚖️TENNESSEE vs Blaise Taylor⚖️ Pregnant Girlfriend Poisoned Trial–Opening Statements
10:00 am Wednesday, June 24, 2026
LIVE NOW: https://t.co/s26FAKQw9s
Taylor faces two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of felony murder in the 2023 poisoning deaths of his… pic.twitter.com/8H083bJyso— American Crime Stories (@AmericanCrime01) June 24, 2026
For conservatives, two truths must stand together. First, the presumption of innocence is a bedrock right. Second, justice demands the full truth when a mother and her unborn child die. This case should not be swayed by media spin or social media hype. The court should press for hard facts: full emergency room records, any preserved drink for lab testing, and thorough phone forensics. A clear record protects life and liberty at the same time [3].
Sources:
[1] Web – Ex-college football star’s pregnant girlfriend’s last words revealed — …
[2] Web – TN v. Blaise Taylor – Day 1 : r/CasesWeFollow
[3] Web – Prosecutors, defense outline competing accounts in Blaise …



