Big city mayors defended their sanctuary policies before a heated House Oversight Committee hearing, with Republicans claiming these policies shield criminal immigrants while Democrats insisted they promote public safety and community trust.
Key Takeaways
- Mayors from Boston, Chicago, Denver, and New York City testified for six hours defending their sanctuary policies, which limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
- Republicans argued these policies violate federal law under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and “create sanctuary for criminals.”
- Mayor Eric Adams stated New York’s sanctuary status was beyond his control due to city, state, and federal law constraints.
- Denver’s Mayor Johnston faced questioning about an illegal immigrant who was released and later assaulted ICE officers.
- Democratic mayors emphasized community trust in law enforcement while avoiding the term “sanctuary” and called for comprehensive immigration reform.
Mayors Defend Policies While Republicans Cite Security Concerns
Four major U.S. city mayors appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to defend their controversial sanctuary policies that limit local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, and New York Mayor Eric Adams spent hours responding to pointed questions from committee members about their cities’ approaches to handling illegal immigrants.
Republican committee members, led by Chairman James Comer, strongly criticized these policies, claiming they violate federal law under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Comer argued sanctuary policies “only create sanctuary for criminals,” highlighting several cases where illegal immigrants allegedly committed serious crimes after being released instead of handed over to ICE officials. The contentious hearing lasted six hours but was notably described by Chairman Comer as the “best-behaved” session of the Congress.
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu struck a defiant tone in her prepared remarks for a House hearing on immigration enforcement, defending the city’s approach and criticizing the Trump administration’s push to deport undocumented immigrants.
Follow live updates: https://t.co/2D8V9ccu1P pic.twitter.com/INoDvu8xXe
— The Boston Globe (@BostonGlobe) March 5, 2025
New York’s Adams Distances Himself From Sanctuary Status
New York Mayor Eric Adams took a different approach than his Democratic colleagues, distancing himself from his city’s sanctuary designation stating, “Over the last three years, federal law did not allow me to stop buses from entering New York City. State law required me to provide all in our city with housing and meals and to educate children. City law makes it unlawful to collaborate with ICE for civil enforcement.” Adams claimed the city’s status was beyond his control due to a combination of legal constraints at multiple levels of government. During testimony, he placed blame on the Biden administration’s handling of the southern border crisis that has sent waves of migrants to major cities.
Adams also addressed questions about the Justice Department’s decision to drop charges against him after an investigation into campaign finance irregularities. Republican members suggested there might have been a quid-pro-quo arrangement related to his immigration stance. Adams firmly denied this implication, stating: “There’s no deal, no quid pro quo, and I did nothing wrong.”
Local Authority vs. Federal Enforcement
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu defended her city’s policies by arguing that local authorities have the right to establish their own regulations. When questioned about the constitutional obligation to comply with federal immigration law, Wu stood firm on her interpretation of local autonomy. Her position highlighted the ongoing tension between state/local government independence and federal enforcement priorities that has defined the sanctuary city debate.
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston faced particularly intense questioning about an incident where his city released an illegal immigrant who later allegedly assaulted ICE officers. Despite this controversy, Johnston maintained that crime rates in Denver had actually decreased despite the influx of immigrants. He called on Congress to move beyond partisan divisions and update immigration laws, noting the local strains caused by federal inaction.
The Trust Factor vs. Rule of Law
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson emphasized that sanctuary policies help build trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement. He rejected what he called “fearmongering” about crime rates, stating that Chicago’s crime has been trending downward despite Republican claims to the contrary. All four mayors argued that having local police enforce federal immigration laws creates mistrust that prevents immigrants from reporting crimes or cooperating with police investigations.
ICE officials have repeatedly claimed that non-cooperation from sanctuary cities strains their resources and potentially endangers their agents when they must conduct operations without local support. This operational concern represents a practical challenge beyond the political and legal debate. Some Republican lawmakers suggested prosecuting sanctuary city officials, although legal experts have expressed doubt about whether such prosecutions would result in convictions.
Sources:
Big City Mayors Congressional Hearing Testimony Defending Sanctuary City Policy
Republicans hammer mayors of Boston, Chicago, Denver and New York over ‘sanctuary city’ policies
